Ignition

Fusion energy is often treated as a running joke in discussions of climate change and energy, failing to deliver after decades of research. But scientists say fusion has never been treated as a priority and with some recent advances, they say we’re closer than ever to getting more out of it than we put in.

This is the companion article to the fusion episode of the Unexplainable podcast.

I've got a plan for that

It shouldn’t be too much of a surprise that Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren has not one plan, but several, devoted to fighting climate change. But what’s interesting is that she doesn’t treat it primarily as an environmental issue. Rather, her proposals so far tackle it as a public lands issue, a national security concern, and as an opportunity for economic development. And according to Warren, the root cause of the problem is corruption.

The path forward

Climate scientists who ostensibly agree on the scale and scope of climate change are at odds over the best solution to the problem. In particular, several scientists have adamantly debated the role of nuclear energy and renewable energy.

I put together a three-part series on this issue, looking at the case for nuclear energy, profiling a scientist who says we can save the world with just renewables, and examining why the debate has become so heated

A cooling tower at the Callaway Nuclear Power Plant in Missouri

A cooling tower at the Callaway Nuclear Power Plant in Missouri